Colorado Complaint Access — Source library
Public documentation snapshot: 2026-09-08
Find the rule that actually applies.
Free, cited search of Colorado's licensing rules and license records, plus guided help preparing a complaint.
Find the rule that actually applies.
Built for: A Coloradan who thinks a licensed professional crossed a line and has no idea which board to talk to · Anyone checking whether a counselor, contractor, broker, dentist, or doctor holds a current Colorado license right now · Licensees and practice managers who need today's exact rule text, with a citation a board will recognize · Spanish-speaking Coloradans who keep getting pushed into English-only state portals
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
Something happened with a professional you trusted. A counselor, a contractor, a real-estate broker, a dentist. You want to know whether a rule was actually broken and what you are supposed to do about it. So you start looking, because Colorado publishes all of this. The rules are public. The license records are public. The complaint forms are public. Twenty minutes later you are eleven tabs deep in a Code of Regulations index, staring at a PDF numbered 3 CCR 705-1, with no way to tell whether the page in front of you is the rule in force today or a version that was replaced years ago. The searching is the problem, not the secrecy. Colorado's regulatory rules are spread across roughly fifty separate boards, divisions, and programs. Each one has its own document set, its own numbering, its own archive of superseded versions, its own stack of rulemaking dockets, and its own list of outside standards it incorporates by reference. Nothing on the page tells you which of those layers you have landed on. A general web search will happily hand you a confident paragraph from a rule that was rescinded, or from a completely different profession, with nothing in the answer to warn you. If English is not your first language, the wall is taller and the state portals do not help you climb it. And then there is the complaint itself. Most people who have a real, legitimate complaint never file one. Not because they changed their minds, but because the process asks for the exact board, the exact license number, the right dates, a clean written account, and a web portal that sometimes puts a human-verification step in the way. The people who give up first are the ones with the least reliable internet and the least confidence writing a formal narrative. A complaint that never gets filed never shows up in anyone's statistics, so nobody counts the cost.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
Answers carry the authority, rule code, excerpt, printed page, and a link to the official document, so you can verify every claim at the source instead of trusting the tool.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
Current law is structurally separated from everything else, and every historical, rulemaking, statutory, or incorporated record is labeled with its legal status before you read it.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
The search fails closed. If the source scope, legal-status labeling, or citation cannot be verified, it returns nothing and says so rather than producing a plausible answer nobody can check.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
It abstains on out-of-scope questions instead of reaching for the nearest keyword match, and it names the corpus it searched on every single response.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
A complaint is only called filed when an agency confirmation actually comes back, and the caller personally approves the final submission while still on the line.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
Bilingual by construction across both websites, the telephone service, and the phone apps, rather than an English product with a translated landing page.
Colorado Complaint Access exists because of this.
Free public search with no account, plus published statistics, a downloadable provider export, and a published methodology anyone can check.
How Colorado Complaint Access works, start to finish.
Colorado Complaint Access is two free public services that share one system. One covers professional and occupational licensing in Colorado. The other covers the state's sex offense management standards and the providers listed under them. Both are open to anyone, in English or Spanish, with no account, no sign-up, and nothing to install. You can use either one from a browser, and both will answer without ever asking who you are. The licensing side does two separate jobs. First, you ask a question in ordinary words, the way you would ask a person: what has to be in a counselor's mandatory disclosure statement, what a real-estate broker must do with a client's trust account, how much continuing education a physician needs. The service searches 88 current Colorado Code of Regulations rule documents across 50 currently active regulatory authorities and answers with the rule's own words. Every result carries the authority that issued it, the rule number and heading, the exact excerpt, the printed page, and a link that opens the official document so you can read it yourself. It does not paraphrase the rule into something friendlier and hope you trust it. What separates current law from everything else is treated as the whole point rather than a detail. Behind the current rules sits a very large archive: 2,921 published rule versions, the rulemaking dockets and attachments behind those changes, Colorado Register issues, the state and federal statutes the rules cite, and the outside standards they incorporate by name. You choose which of six layers to search. Current rules are the governing layer and are returned on their own. Every other record comes back in a separate section with its document type and its legal status printed before the excerpt, so a superseded version or a hearing attachment can never quietly stand in for the rule in force. If the underlying source cannot be verified, the search stops and says so rather than producing a plausible answer with nothing behind it. Ask something it does not cover and it returns no matches and says why, instead of reaching for the nearest paragraph. Second, the licensing side puts Colorado's published license records into a directory you can actually search. Nearly six hundred thousand active records, searchable by person or business name, exact license number, profession, license category, status, city, and state, across 40 license categories and 344 license types. Where the state's data lists a public board or program action, the result shows the case number, the action, the effective date, and the completion date, and links straight to the official verification record so you can confirm it at the source. Nothing loads until you actually search for something. The standards side does the same thing for Colorado's January 2026 adult and juvenile sex offense management standards. Ask a question and get the exact official language, the standard number, and the printed page it appears on, with a link to the source PDF. Alongside it is a searchable directory of the state's listed adult evaluation, treatment, and polygraph providers, refreshed nightly from the official public provider system, with radius search by ZIP, filters for service type and language and county, and a separately sourced tag for providers approved under the state corrections department's Client Choice program. The independence notice is on every page: this is not the official state site, and the state record is always the one that governs. Alongside the free search, a bilingual telephone service is being brought up for people who cannot or will not use a web form. A caller is walked through identifying the right licensee or provider, describing what happened, and reviewing a drafted complaint read back to them out loud, in English or Spanish. The caller stays on the line through the entire filing, personally answers any human-verification step the agency's own site presents, and gives a separate final approval before anything is submitted. Nothing is bypassed on the agency's site on the caller's behalf. That line is still completing its acceptance testing: card charging is switched off, no complaint has been prepared or filed through it yet, and the site tells callers not to rely on it for a deadline-sensitive filing. A complaint is never described as filed just because a caller authorized it. Until the agency returns a real confirmation, the paperwork says so in plain words. Anything sensitive a caller shares is encrypted while it is needed and deleted on a short schedule, and the public statistics published from all of this contain no names, narratives, transcripts, or contact details.
Everything in the current release.
Each of these is built and working today. Nothing on this list is a roadmap item.
Ask in plain language and get the rule itself
You type the question the way you would say it out loud. No rule number, no board name, no legal phrasing required. The answer comes back as the regulation's own text, not a summary someone wrote about it, so what you read is what the board actually published.
Every answer opens the real document
Each result names the authority that issued the rule, the rule code and heading, the printed page, and a direct link to the official source. You are never asked to take the answer on faith. Two clicks and you are reading the state's own document at the state's own address.
Current rules are never blended with old ones
Rules in force today are the governing layer and are returned on their own, in their own section of the page. Superseded versions, hearing records, and background material can never take the place of current rule text. This is enforced in the service itself, not left to the reader to notice.
Six layers of official material, each labeled
You can search current rules only, or open up the archive: historical rule versions, rulemaking dockets and attachments, Colorado Register issues, the state and federal statutes the rules cite, and the outside standards they incorporate by name. Every one of those results shows its document type and its legal status before you read a word of it.
It tells you when it has nothing
Ask something outside Colorado regulatory rules and the search returns no matches and says so, in your language, instead of stretching to find the nearest paragraph. Ask a landlord question and you will not get a securities rule. In a compliance tool, an honest blank is worth more than a confident wrong answer.
Search Colorado's public license records
Look up a person, a business, or an exact license number across the state's published license data. Filter by profession, category, status, city, and state, and choose whether to include expired, inactive, cancelled, and suspended records. Active licenses are shown by default so you are not misled by a record that lapsed years ago.
Public board actions appear right in the result
When the state's data lists a public board or program action against a licensee, the result shows the case number, the action, the effective date, and the completion date. Each record links to the official verification page, where the complete agency record and its public documents live. The action is the agency's, and the result says so.
Sex offense management standards, cited to the printed page
Ask a question about the January 2026 adult or juvenile standards and get the exact official excerpt, the standard number, and the printed page number, with a link to the source PDF. The service states which body of standards it searched on every answer, and never mixes the two populations with each other or with licensing rules.
A provider directory refreshed every night
Search the state's listed adult evaluation, treatment, and polygraph providers by name, agency, or ZIP radius, with filters for service type, practice level, county served, city, language, and specialty. The listing is rebuilt nightly from the official public provider system and the page shows when the last refresh succeeded. Providers approved under the corrections department's Client Choice program carry a separately sourced tag with their current contact details.
English and Spanish across both websites
Both public sites work fully in English and Spanish, and you can switch at any time without losing your place. The telephone service and the phone apps are bilingual too. Where the official text is only published in English, the service says so plainly and shows you the English source rather than quietly translating a regulation and letting you rely on it.
Free, with nothing to sign up for
Rule search, standards search, provider search, and license search cost nothing and require no account, no email address, and no app install. There is an optional donation button that does not change results, access, eligibility, or any agency decision, and the page says that outright.
Built so you never have to type private details
The search boxes ask you for a question about the rules, not your story. Both search pages carry a privacy notice telling you not to enter names, case numbers, contact information, or complaint facts, and the questions you ask are not folded into complaint statistics. The rule search deliberately holds no license, person, or case information at all.
Download the provider list and check the statistics
The provider directory exports as a spreadsheet file straight from the site, with no account, and the published complaint statistics come with a plain-English methodology page defining every term counted. Both are open to anyone, so you can audit the numbers instead of taking them on trust.
Guided help preparing a complaint, by phone (in acceptance testing)
A bilingual telephone service is being brought up for people who cannot use a web form. It walks a caller through identifying the right licensee or provider, describing what happened, and reviewing a draft read back out loud so it can be corrected. The caller stays on the line through the entire filing, personally answers any human-verification step the agency's site presents, and gives a separate final approval before anything is submitted. It is still finishing acceptance, card charging is switched off, and nothing has been filed through it yet.
"Filed" means an agency actually took it
Authorizing a filing and completing one are treated as two different things. Until the agency returns a real confirmation, the documents say authorized for filing, agency confirmation pending, in those words. A filing receipt is only produced once an actual agency reference has been recorded, and the public statistics count a complaint as filed on the same basis.
Numbers we can stand behind.
Every figure below comes from the product's own release record or test suite, not from a marketing estimate.
Numbers we can stand behind.
Independence is stated on every surface: this is not a government site and does not decide whether anyone broke a rule.
Surfaces and status.
Status as of 2026-09-02. Both public sites returned HTTP 200 on 2026-09-02 and the service health endpoint reported version 0.4.53, the release recorded as deployed on 2026-08-25. A live rule question returned the current Licensed Professional Counselor mandatory disclosure rule with its official citation and source link, and an out-of-scope question correctly returned zero matches with an explicit abstention. The live license directory reported 599,691 active records and returned a licensee's public board actions with case number, action, effective date, completion date, and the official verification link. The live standards search returned cited January 2026 adult standards with printed page numbers. The provider directory's last successful nightly refresh was 2026-09-02 at 08:22 UTC, covering 237 providers across 339 locations. The current release passes 255/255 automated tests. Live describes the free public search: the telephone complaint-assistance line is not yet in general use, card charging is switched off, and the published statistics show zero complaints prepared and zero filed.
Worth more together.
Products on this platform share one sign-in, one support queue, and one engineering standard. These pair naturally with Colorado Complaint Access.
Policy Lens
The same discipline applied to any body of policy you have to answer questions against, not just Colorado regulatory rules. Useful when an organization needs cited, source-linked answers over its own manuals and standards.
ASL Doctor Search
A Colorado license tells you what the state licensed. If you are vetting a healthcare provider, the free federal provider registry lookup answers a different half of the question, in the same free, bilingual, no-account style.
ASL Therapy
For treatment providers listed in the standards directory: structured treatment programs and documentation built around the same reviewed sex offense management standards this service cites.
ASL Support
For an agency or board running this as an intake channel, the shared support desk is where a stuck or failed filing is escalated automatically, with no caller details in the ticket.
Recent progress.
This product ships often. The most recent verified changes, newest first.
Recent progress.
2026-08-22 the Colorado License Search phone app was rebuilt to put the independent, non-government notice in front of the search form, add a dedicated official-sources screen, and link every result back to the state's original dataset and verification record. It passed emulator and physical-device acceptance, and the signed build was submitted to a closed testing track, where the store reported it as in review.
Recent progress.
2026-08-24 three releases in one day. The public rule search was widened from a single profession to the full set of Colorado authorities, with the previous narrow local search demoted to a strictly limited fallback so it could no longer answer a physician or broker question with an accountancy rule. Then the complete archive went in: six selectable document layers, with every non-current record labeled by document type and legal status before its excerpt. Then the page itself was repaired, after a live measurement found the rule search sitting more than 26,000 pixels below the top of the page behind an unbounded directory of license cards; it now opens directly onto the search and loads no records until you ask for some.
Recent progress.
2026-08-25 the service was switched to a single policy search path and the old local fallback was deleted outright. It now fails closed. If scope, legal-status labeling, evidence lane, or citation cannot be verified, it returns an error instead of a partial answer, on the principle that a clear outage is more trustworthy than a quiet substitute. That release, 0.4.53, was verified live the same day and is the one running now. Checked live on.
Recent progress.
2026-09-02 both sites answering, the license directory holding 599,691 active records, and the provider directory's last successful nightly refresh at 08:22 UTC that morning, covering 237 providers across 339 locations.
Recent progress.
Public search is free and requires no account: rule search, standards search, license directory, and provider directory all cost nothing, as do the provider spreadsheet export and the statistics methodology page. The optional telephone complaint-preparation service is published at $5.00, charged by ASL LLC and clearly not a state filing fee; the state agencies also accept complaints directly with no ASL fee, and card charging on the phone line is currently switched off pending final acceptance. Optional donations of $5, $10, $20, or $50 are offered on both sites and change nothing about access, results, or eligibility. Agency and board contract pricing is not published.
What does it cost?
Searching rules, standards, licenses, and providers is free and always has been. There is no account, no trial, and no card. The only priced item is the optional telephone service to prepare and help file a complaint, published at $5, and that charge is currently switched off while the phone line finishes acceptance. Colorado's agencies also accept complaints directly with no fee to us at all, and we say that on the phone before you give us any facts.
We already use the state's own websites. Why would we use this?
Keep using them, and check us against them. The state sites are the authority. What is missing there is a single place to ask a question in ordinary words across all fifty boards at once, and to be told clearly whether the document you landed on is in force today. Every result here links straight back to the state's own document, so this is a way into the official sources rather than a replacement for them.
Is this a government service?
No. It is independent software operated by ASL LLC. It is not the Department of Regulatory Agencies, not the Sex Offender Management Board, not the State of Colorado, and not a law firm. We do not decide whether anyone violated a rule, and we never present ourselves as endorsed by an agency. That notice is on every page, and in the phone app it appears before the search box.
What happens to what I type in?
The rule and standards search deliberately holds no personal, license, or case information at all, and both search pages ask you not to enter names, case numbers, contact details, or complaint facts. Your questions are not added to complaint statistics. If you use the phone service, the sensitive content is encrypted while it is needed, deleted on a short schedule after your documents are delivered, and never published in statistics.
How do I know the answer is real and not made up?
Because you can open it. Every result shows the authority, the rule or standard number, the exact excerpt, the printed page, and a link to the official document. If the service cannot verify the scope and the legal status of what it found, it returns nothing and tells you, instead of guessing. It also abstains on questions outside what it covers rather than reaching for the closest keyword.
Can I trust it to tell me what the rule is today, not what it used to be?
That is the single thing it is most careful about. Current rules are the governing layer and come back on their own. Historical versions, hearing records, register issues, statutes, and incorporated outside standards only appear when you ask for them, in a separate section, with the document type and legal status printed before the text. A superseded version can never quietly stand in for the rule in force.
What if I stop paying, or you go away?
There is nothing to stop paying for on the search side, and no account to lose. Everything the service shows you links back to the state's own published documents and verification records, so if it disappeared tomorrow the sources it points at are still there and still free. You can also export the provider directory as a spreadsheet today. Nothing you rely on is locked inside it.
Do I have to move any data or install anything?
No. Open the website and start typing. Nothing to import, nothing to configure, no data of yours to migrate. Phone apps exist for people who prefer them, but they do the same things the free website already does, and they are not publicly released yet.
Is it ready to use right now?
The free search side is live and answering today. The current release has been running since 25 August 2026, license records refresh from the state's published data, and the provider directory rebuilds nightly. The telephone complaint-assistance line is the piece still finishing acceptance, and we ask people not to rely on it for a deadline-sensitive filing yet.
What should I know before I rely on it?
We would rather you hear this from us than discover it later. As of 2026-09-02:
What should I know before I rely on it?
The telephone complaint-assistance line is still completing acceptance testing. Card charging is switched off and the site tells callers not to rely on the phone line for a filing that is up against a deadline. Use the free web search and the official agency channels for anything time-critical.
What should I know before I rely on it?
No complaints have been prepared or filed through the service yet. The public statistics page shows zero, and we would rather you see that than a padded number.
What should I know before I rely on it?
License records come from Colorado's published data. Public records can be incomplete, delayed, duplicated, or changed after we read them, so every result links to the official verification record and important decisions should be confirmed there.
What should I know before I rely on it?
The rule search covers rules and their supporting official documents. It does not search disciplinary orders, individual license records, or the sex offense management standards, and the standards search does not search licensing rules. Each answer states which body it searched.
What should I know before I rely on it?
This is not legal advice and not a finding. A matched rule is a possible match, not a determination that anyone violated anything. Only the relevant Colorado agency decides that.
What should I know before I rely on it?
The official rules and standards are published in English. Where an excerpt is quoted, the English source text is shown even when the interface is in Spanish, because a translated regulation is not the regulation.
What should I know before I rely on it?
Published statistics cover activity assisted through this service only. They are not the complete official record of complaints made to Colorado agencies through other channels.
What should I know before I rely on it?
The provider directory covers the state's listed adult providers. The standards search covers both adult and juvenile standards, but the directory does not list juvenile-only providers.
What should I know before I rely on it?
The Colorado License Search phone app was submitted to a closed testing track in August 2026 and has not been released publicly; the standards app reaches a configured tester list only. The iPhone app exists as source and has not been built or submitted. Everything the apps do is available free on the websites today.
What should I know before I rely on it?
The voice-assistant lookup skills are written and tested but have not been created or certified in the voice platform's developer console, so they are not something you can enable today.
Find the rule that actually applies.
Prefer email? contact@autosecurelogin.com